Sempron 3500+ EE SFF vs Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Sempron 3500+ EE SFF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2792 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.62 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Manila (2001−2006) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | May 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Sempron 3500+ EE SFF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 103 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 81 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Sempron 3500+ EE SFF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Sempron 3500+ EE SFF. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is a notebook processor while Sempron 3500+ EE SFF is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Sempron 3500+ EE SFF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
