Solo T1200 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T1500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40
+150%
Core Solo T1200
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.16

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Core Solo T1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29883287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreCore Solo
Power efficiency1.080.56
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz667 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data90 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data479
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt27 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 0.16
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 27 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 has a 150% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Solo T1200, on the other hand, has 29.6% lower power consumption.

The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Core Solo T1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Intel Core Solo T1200
Core Solo T1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate Core Solo T1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1500 or Core Solo T1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.