Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Dual-Core T1400
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3300 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2980 | 3011 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 1.14 | 1.09 |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 February 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | P | Socket P 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.42 | 0.40 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 1 February 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 has a 5% higher aggregate performance score.
Celeron Dual-Core T3300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
