Pentium III 1400S vs Celeron D 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 350 and Pentium III 1400S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data0.35
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Tualatin (2000−2002)
Release dateJune 2005 (19 years ago)January 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 350 and Pentium III 1400S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache16 KB8 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die size109 mm280 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors125 million44 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 350 and Pentium III 1400S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478370
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 350 and Pentium III 1400S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 350 and Pentium III 1400S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 350 and Pentium III 1400S are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 350 and Pentium III 1400S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 32 Watt

Celeron D 350 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium III 1400S, on the other hand, has 128.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 350 and Pentium III 1400S. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 350 and Pentium III 1400S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 350
Celeron D 350
Intel Pentium III 1400S
Pentium III 1400S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 12 votes

Rate Celeron D 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate Pentium III 1400S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 350 or Pentium III 1400S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.