Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs Celeron D 350

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 350 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Prescott (2001−2005)	Manchester (2005−2006)
Release date	June 2005 (19 years ago)	31 May 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 350 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	2 GHz
L1 cache	16 KB	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	90 nm	90 nm
Die size	109 mm2	156 mm2
Maximum core temperature	67 °C	no data
Number of transistors	125 million	154 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.25V-1.4V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 350 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	PPGA478	939
Power consumption (TDP)	73 Watt	89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 350 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 350 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 350 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ are enumerated here.

VT-x

-

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 350 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2

DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Power consumption (TDP)	73 Watt	89 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 350 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---