Apple M2 Max vs Celeron B720

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B720
2012
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.51
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.84
+3202%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Celeron B720 by a whopping 3202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B720 and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2863386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronApple M-Series
Power efficiency1.3720.09
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B720 and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)36 MB
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B720 and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketG2 (988B)no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B720 and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B720 and Apple M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B720 and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B720 and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B720 and Apple M2 Max integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B720 and Apple M2 Max.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B720 0.51
Apple M2 Max 16.84
+3202%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B720 814
Apple M2 Max 26649
+3174%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 16.84
Recency 1 January 2012 17 January 2023
Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 79 Watt

Celeron B720 has 125.7% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 3202% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B720 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B720 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B720
Celeron B720
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Celeron B720 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 233 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B720 or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.