Sempron 150 vs Celeron B720

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B720
2012
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.51
+34.2%
Sempron 150
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 45 Watt
0.38

Celeron B720 outperforms Sempron 150 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B720 and Sempron 150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28643017
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.380.80
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sargas (2009−2011)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)7 December 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$73

Detailed specifications

Celeron B720 and Sempron 150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size131 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million234 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B720 and Sempron 150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketG2 (988B)AM3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B720 and Sempron 150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B720 and Sempron 150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B720 and Sempron 150 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B720 and Sempron 150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B720 and Sempron 150 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B720 and Sempron 150.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B720 0.51
+34.2%
Sempron 150 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B720 814
+36.3%
Sempron 150 597

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 0.38
Recency 1 January 2012 7 December 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron B720 has a 34.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Celeron B720 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron B720 is a notebook processor while Sempron 150 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B720 and Sempron 150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B720
Celeron B720
AMD Sempron 150
Sempron 150

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Celeron B720 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Sempron 150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B720 or Sempron 150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.