EPYC 9135 vs Celeron 925
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 925 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Architecture codename | no data | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,214 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 925 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.65 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 925 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 925 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 925 and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 925 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 925 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 925 and EPYC 9135.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2011 | 10 October 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 200 Watt |
Celeron 925 has 471.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 925 and EPYC 9135. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 925 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 925 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
