E1-2200 vs Celeron 925

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 925
2011
35 Watt
0.30
E1-2200
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.30

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 925 and E1-2200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31153117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency0.813.15
Architecture codenameno dataKabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 January 2011 (13 years ago)5 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 925 and E1-2200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1.05 GHz
L2 cacheno data1024 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 925 and E1-2200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFT3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 925 and E1-2200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 925 and E1-2200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 925 and E1-2200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 925 and E1-2200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8210
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 925 and E1-2200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 925 and E1-2200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 925 and E1-2200.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 925 0.30
E1-2200 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 925 477
+0.6%
E1-2200 474

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2011 5 November 2013
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 9 Watt

E1-2200 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 288.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 925 and E1-2200.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 925 and E1-2200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 925
Celeron 925
AMD E1-2200
E1-2200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate E1-2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 925 or E1-2200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.