Athlon II Neo K125 vs Atom E3826

Place in the ranking	3247	3235
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Atom	AMD Athlon II Neo
Power efficiency	2.57	1.58
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-I (2013)	Geneva (2010)
Release date	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)	12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom E3826 and Athlon II Neo K125 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Boost clock speed	1.47 GHz	1.7 GHz
Bus rate	no data	2000 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	22 nm	45 nm
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Atom E3826 and Athlon II Neo K125 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	Intel BGA1170	S1
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3826 and Athlon II Neo K125. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E3826 and Athlon II Neo K125 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3826 and Athlon II Neo K125. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel HD Graphics

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom E3826 0.19

Athlon II Neo K125 0.20
+5.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom E3826 304

Athlon II Neo K125 315
+3.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.19	0.20
Recency	8 October 2013	12 May 2010
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	22 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	12 Watt

Atom E3826 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

Athlon II Neo K125, on the other hand, has a 5.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom E3826 and Athlon II Neo K125.

Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3826 and Athlon II Neo K125, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.