C-30 vs Celeron 847E

Place in the ranking	3046	3371
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	AMD C-Series
Power efficiency	2.06	1.16
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date	no data	4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$111	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847E and C-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Boost clock speed	1.1 GHz	1.2 GHz
Bus type	DMI 2.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	11	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	512 KB
L3 cache	2 MB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	40 nm
Die size	131 mm²	75 mm²
Number of transistors	504 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847E and C-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	no data	FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847E and C-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	40 nm, 1.24-1.35V
FMA	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847E and C-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847E and C-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1333	DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size	16 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21.335 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

AMD Radeon HD 6250

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 847E 0.37
+236%

C-30 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 847E 584
+228%

C-30 178

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.37	0.11
Integrated graphics card	0.34	0.24
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	9 Watt

Celeron 847E has a 236.4% higher aggregate performance score, 41.7% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

C-30, on the other hand, has 88.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 847E is our recommended choice as it beats the C-30 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847E and C-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.