Ryzen 7 2700 vs Celeron 787

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.39
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)13 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed1.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1332
L1 cache64 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size131 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023AM4 (1331)
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency950 MHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2011 13 April 2018
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 787 has 282.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 2700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 787 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 787 and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 787
Celeron 787
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 787 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3005 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 787 or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.