Xeon Gold 6338 vs Celeron 725C
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 725C and Xeon Gold 6338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 252 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.83 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | no data |
| Release date | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 725C and Xeon Gold 6338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB (shared) | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 725C and Xeon Gold 6338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 725C and Xeon Gold 6338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 725C and Xeon Gold 6338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 725C and Xeon Gold 6338 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 725C and Xeon Gold 6338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 725C and Xeon Gold 6338.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2011 | 1 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 205 Watt |
Celeron 725C has 1105.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6338, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 725C and Xeon Gold 6338. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 725C is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6338 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 725C and Xeon Gold 6338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
