Apple M1 vs Celeron 6205

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6205 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeApple Apple M-Series
Architecture codenameTiger Lake U (2020)no data
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6205 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed2/2 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache160 KB2 MB
L2 cache2.5 MB16 MB
L3 cache4 MB16 MB
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Number of transistorsno data16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6205 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1499no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUsApple M1 8-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 4.55 14.54
Recency 1 September 2020 10 November 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has 219.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 months, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 6205 and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6205 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2227 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6205 or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.