Apple M1 vs Celeron 6205
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 6205 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1206 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Tiger Lake | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake U (2020) | no data |
| Release date | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 6205 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.064 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2/2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 6205 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA1499 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) | Apple M1 8-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.56 | 14.49 |
| Recency | 1 September 2020 | 10 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M1 has 217.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 months, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 6205 and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6205 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
