Ultra 7 164U vs Celeron 430

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 430
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.18
Core Ultra 7 164U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 9 Watt
9.51
+5183%

Core Ultra 7 164U outperforms Celeron 430 by a whopping 5183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3247797
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency0.49100.00
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Meteor Lake-U (2023)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$50$448

Detailed specifications

Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads114
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature60 °C110 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCBGA2551
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.8 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8
PCI supportno data4.0 and 3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 430 0.18
Ultra 7 164U 9.51
+5183%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 430 289
Ultra 7 164U 15106
+5127%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 9.51
Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 14
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 9 Watt

Ultra 7 164U has a 5183.3% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and 288.9% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 164U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 430 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron 430 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 164U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 430 and Core Ultra 7 164U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 430
Celeron 430
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Core Ultra 7 164U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 159 votes

Rate Celeron 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 164U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 430 or Core Ultra 7 164U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.