VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 vs Celeron 220

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 220 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataC3-M
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Nehemiah
Release dateOctober 2007 (17 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 220 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz200 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 220 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPBGA479no data
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 220 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 220 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 220 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron 220 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

VIA C3-M C3-M-1200, on the other hand, has 5.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 220 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 220 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 220
Celeron 220
VIA C3-M C3-M-1200
C3-M C3-M-1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 59 votes

Rate Celeron 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 220 or VIA C3-M C3-M-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.