Core 2 Quad Q7600 vs Celeron 2.80
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 2.80 and Core 2 Quad Q7600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| Release date | November 2003 (21 year ago) | 31 August 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2.80 and Core 2 Quad Q7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 146 mm2 | 2x 82 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | 55 million | 456 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2.80 and Core 2 Quad Q7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 478 | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2.80 and Core 2 Quad Q7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.80 and Core 2 Quad Q7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2.80 and Core 2 Quad Q7600.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron 2.80 has 30.1% lower power consumption.
Core 2 Quad Q7600, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 2.80 and Core 2 Quad Q7600. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.80 and Core 2 Quad Q7600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
