Apple M2 Pro vs Celeron 1037U

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1037U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.65
Apple M2 Pro
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 2424 Watt
14.20
+2085%

Apple M2 Pro outperforms Celeron 1037U by a whopping 2085% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1037U and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2762536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency3.49no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)no data
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1037U and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)36 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1037U and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1023no data
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt2424 ‑ 3504 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1037U and Apple M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1037U and Apple M2 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1037U and Apple M2 Pro are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1037U and Apple M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1037U and Apple M2 Pro integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1037U and Apple M2 Pro.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1037U 0.65
Apple M2 Pro 14.20
+2085%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1037U 998
Apple M2 Pro 21731
+2077%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 14.20
Recency 20 January 2013 17 January 2023
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 2424 Watt

Celeron 1037U has 14158.8% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has a 2084.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1037U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1037U and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1037U
Celeron 1037U
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 75 votes

Rate Celeron 1037U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 170 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1037U or Apple M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.