Celeron 1037U vs Pentium J2850

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium J2850
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.65
+1.6%
Celeron 1037U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.64

Pentium J2850 outperforms Celeron 1037U by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27542766
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Power efficiency6.043.50
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$94$86

Detailed specifications

Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.41 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache224 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data118 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequency854 MHz1 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium J2850 0.65
+1.6%
Celeron 1037U 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium J2850 1016
+1.8%
Celeron 1037U 998

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 0.64
Recency 1 September 2013 20 January 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

Pentium J2850 has a 1.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 70% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium J2850 and Celeron 1037U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium J2850
Pentium J2850
Intel Celeron 1037U
Celeron 1037U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate Pentium J2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 75 votes

Rate Celeron 1037U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium J2850 or Celeron 1037U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.