Ryzen Threadripper 1977X vs C-50
Primary details
Comparing C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 155 Watt |
C-50 has 1622.2% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1977X, on the other hand, has 600% more physical cores, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that C-50 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1977X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-50 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
