Phenom II X3 B75 vs A4-5300

Aggregate performance score

A4-5300
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.86
Phenom II X3 B75
2009
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
1.12
+30.2%

Phenom II X3 B75 outperforms A4-5300 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5300 and Phenom II X3 B75 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25582390
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.251.12
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Heka (2009−2010)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 October 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-5300 and Phenom II X3 B75 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2258 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-5300 and Phenom II X3 B75 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5300 and Phenom II X3 B75. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, XOP, FMA3, FMA4no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5300 and Phenom II X3 B75 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5300 and Phenom II X3 B75. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7480D (724 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5300 and Phenom II X3 B75.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5300 0.86
Phenom II X3 B75 1.12
+30.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-5300 1360
Phenom II X3 B75 1781
+31%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-5300 369
Phenom II X3 B75 396
+7.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-5300 504
Phenom II X3 B75 980
+94.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.86 1.12
Recency 2 October 2012 1 October 2009
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

A4-5300 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X3 B75, on the other hand, has a 30.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Phenom II X3 B75 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-5300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5300 and Phenom II X3 B75, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5300
A4-5300
AMD Phenom II X3 B75
Phenom II X3 B75

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 223 votes

Rate A4-5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 B75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5300 or Phenom II X3 B75, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.