FX PRO-8800P vs Atom x7213RE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7213RE and FX PRO-8800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Architecture codenameAmston Lake (2024)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)2 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7213RE and FX PRO-8800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)320 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB (per module)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7213RE and FX PRO-8800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264FP4
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7213RE and FX PRO-8800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7213RE and FX PRO-8800P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7213RE and FX PRO-8800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 16EURadeon R7 8CU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7213RE and FX PRO-8800P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes98

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 April 2024 2 June 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 15 Watt

Atom x7213RE has an age advantage of 8 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

FX PRO-8800P, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom x7213RE and FX PRO-8800P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7213RE and FX PRO-8800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7213RE
Atom x7213RE
AMD FX PRO-8800P
FX PRO-8800P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7213RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate FX PRO-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7213RE or FX PRO-8800P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.