Ultra 7 265KF vs Atom x5-E3930

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-E3930
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.58
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.46
+6359%

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a whopping 6359% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E3930 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking281482
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data99.21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Power efficiency7.8028.21
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date30 August 2014 (10 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E3930 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed1.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E3930 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 12961851
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Atom x5-E3930 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-E3930 0.58
Ultra 7 265KF 37.46
+6359%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-E3930 928
Ultra 7 265KF 59499
+6312%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 37.46
Recency 30 August 2014 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 125 Watt

Atom x5-E3930 has 1685.7% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 6358.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-E3930 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E3930 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E3930 or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.