i3-9100F vs Atom Z3770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z3770
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.46
Core i3-9100F
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.24
+822%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Atom Z3770 by a whopping 822% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z3770 and Core i3-9100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29191373
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.98
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency5.446.17
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date27 September 2013 (11 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$37$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3770 and Core i3-9100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.46 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.39 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3770 and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketUTFCBGA1380FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3770 and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Atom Z3770 and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3770 and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3770 and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size4 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency667 MHz-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z3770 and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z3770 0.46
i3-9100F 4.24
+822%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z3770 736
i3-9100F 6733
+815%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom Z3770 1189
i3-9100F 6509
+447%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom Z3770 3961
i3-9100F 18118
+357%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom Z3770 26.55
i3-9100F 11.81
+125%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Atom Z3770 0.9
i3-9100F 3
+249%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Atom Z3770 8
i3-9100F 44
+480%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Atom Z3770 40
i3-9100F 218
+438%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Atom Z3770 898
i3-9100F 4052
+351%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 4.24
Recency 27 September 2013 23 April 2019
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 65 Watt

Atom Z3770 has 712.5% lower power consumption.

i3-9100F, on the other hand, has a 821.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-9100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom Z3770 is a notebook processor while Core i3-9100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3770 and Core i3-9100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770
Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 7021 vote

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3770 or Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.