3020e vs Atom E640
Primary details
Comparing Atom E640 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2020 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Architecture codename | Tunnel Creek (2010) | Dali (Zen) |
| Release date | 14 September 2010 (13 years ago) | 4 August 2020 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom E640 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E640 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 676 | FT5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E640 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E640 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel GMA 600 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 September 2010 | 4 August 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom E640 has 100% lower power consumption.
3020e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom E640 and 3020e. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E640 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
