Celeron 3865U vs Atom Z2580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z2580
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.25
Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.83
+232%

Celeron 3865U outperforms Atom Z2580 by a whopping 232% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31482580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency7.895.24
Architecture codenameClovertrail (2013)Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Release date27 February 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size65 mm298.7 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors140 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFC-MB4760FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+
PAE32 Bitno data
Smart Idle+no data

Security technologies

Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size2 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth8.5 GB/s34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency533 MHz900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data10
USB revision2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0no data
Number of USB ports2no data
UART3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z2580 0.25
Celeron 3865U 0.83
+232%

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Atom Z2580 1303
Celeron 3865U 3224
+148%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Atom Z2580 552
Celeron 3865U 1843
+234%

Geekbench 2

Atom Z2580 1479
Celeron 3865U 3627
+145%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 0.83
Recency 27 February 2013 3 January 2017
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 15 Watt

Atom Z2580 has 100% more threads, and 400% lower power consumption.

Celeron 3865U, on the other hand, has a 232% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 3865U is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z2580 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2580 and Celeron 3865U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z2580
Atom Z2580
Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Atom Z2580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 116 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z2580 or Celeron 3865U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.