Celeron G6900TE vs Atom E680T
Primary details
Comparing Atom E680T and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2146 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.03 |
| Architecture codename | Tunnel Creek (2010) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 14 September 2010 (14 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom E680T and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E680T and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 676 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E680T and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom E680T and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E680T and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E680T and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel GMA 600 | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E680T and Celeron G6900TE.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 September 2010 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom E680T has 775% lower power consumption.
Celeron G6900TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom E680T and Celeron G6900TE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom E680T is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900TE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E680T and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
