Celeron J3355E vs Atom C3758

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1655not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.52no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency10.98no data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)no data
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)1 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)no data
Threads82
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache448 KBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache16 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature82 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-

Security technologies

Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
SGX-no data
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size256 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E.

PCIe version32.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 1 July 2019
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

Atom C3758 has 300% more threads.

Celeron J3355E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom C3758 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J3355E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758
Intel Celeron J3355E
Celeron J3355E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron J3355E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3758 or Celeron J3355E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.