Celeron J3355E vs Atom C3758
Primary details
Comparing Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1655 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.52 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Atom | no data |
Power efficiency | 10.98 | no data |
Architecture codename | Goldmont (2016−2017) | no data |
Release date | 15 August 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | no data |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Multiplier | 22 | no data |
L1 cache | 448 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 16 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 82 °C | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1310 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
QuickAssist | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Smart Response | no data | - |
Security technologies
Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Boot | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | - | no data |
OS Guard | + | - |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
VT-i | no data | - |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4: 2400 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
Maximum memory size | 256 GB | 8 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | + |
OpenGL | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E.
PCIe version | 3 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 6 |
USB revision | 3 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 16 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 16 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | 4x10/2.5/1 GBE | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 15 August 2017 | 1 July 2019 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 10 Watt |
Atom C3758 has 300% more threads.
Celeron J3355E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom C3758 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J3355E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3758 and Celeron J3355E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.