Atom D2550 vs C3558

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3558 and Atom D2550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2120not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.47no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiency9.06no data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3558 and Atom D2550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.87 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache224 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3558 and Atom D2550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3558 and Atom D2550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

Atom C3558 and Atom D2550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3558 and Atom D2550 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
VT-ino data-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3558 and Atom D2550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3558 and Atom D2550 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3558 and Atom D2550.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes124
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports12no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3558 2431
+494%
Atom D2550 409

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 1 November 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 10 Watt

Atom C3558 has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D2550, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3558 and Atom D2550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom C3558 is a server/workstation processor while Atom D2550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3558 and Atom D2550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3558
Atom C3558
Intel Atom D2550
Atom D2550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Atom C3558 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 36 votes

Rate Atom D2550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3558 or Atom D2550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.