Ultra 5 228V vs Atom C3538

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3538
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.19
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.55
+955%

Core Ultra 5 228V outperforms Atom C3538 by a whopping 955% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3538 and Core Ultra 5 228V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2357619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency7.4769.50
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3538 and Core Ultra 5 228V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache224 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature87 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3538 and Core Ultra 5 228V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3538 and Core Ultra 5 228V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+

Security technologies

Atom C3538 and Core Ultra 5 228V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3538 and Core Ultra 5 228V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3538 and Core Ultra 5 228V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 130V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3538 and Core Ultra 5 228V.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes124
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports12no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3538 1.19
Ultra 5 228V 12.55
+955%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3538 1889
Ultra 5 228V 19930
+955%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 12.55
Recency 15 August 2017 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 17 Watt

Atom C3538 has 13.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 228V, on the other hand, has a 954.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 228V is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3538 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3538 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 228V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3538 and Core Ultra 5 228V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3538
Atom C3538
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
Core Ultra 5 228V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Atom C3538 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 228V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3538 or Core Ultra 5 228V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.