Xeon w9-3595X vs Atom C3308

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3308 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated13
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.18
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data15.36
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$32$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3308 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Threads2120
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache112 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB112.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3308 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)9.5 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3308 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom C3308 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3308 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3308 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 1866DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels18
Maximum memory bandwidth14.936 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3308 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes6112
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 60
Threads 2 120
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 385 Watt

Atom C3308 has 4177.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and 2900% more physical cores and 5900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3308 and Xeon w9-3595X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3308 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3308
Atom C3308
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3308 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 35 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3308 or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.