Xeon w9-3595X vs Atom C3538

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3538 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2361	13
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	20.42
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Atom	no data
Power efficiency	7.50	15.46
Architecture codename	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date	15 August 2017 (7 years ago)	24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$75	$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3595X has 50950% better value for money than Atom C3538.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3538 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Threads	4	120
Base clock speed	2.1 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.1 GHz	4.8 GHz
Multiplier	21	no data
L1 cache	224 KB	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	8 MB	2 MB (per core)
L3 cache	8 MB	112.5 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Die size	no data	4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature	87 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	81 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3538 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCBGA1310	FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
QuickAssist	+	no data
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
TSX	-	+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	+
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

Atom C3538 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Boot	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
SGX	-	-
OS Guard	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4: 2133	DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size	256 GB	4 TB
Max memory channels	2	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	29.871 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version	3	5.0
PCI Express lanes	12	112
USB revision	3	no data
Total number of SATA ports	12	no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	12	no data
Number of USB ports	8	no data
Integrated LAN	2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBE	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.19	62.95
Recency	15 August 2017	24 August 2024
Physical cores	4	60
Threads	4	120
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	385 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3538 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---