Celeron 1037U vs Athlon X2 340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 340
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.85
+30.8%

Athlon X2 340 outperforms Celeron 1037U by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 340 and Celeron 1037U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25752760
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.193.49
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 340 and Celeron 1037U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache96K64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,303 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 340 and Celeron 1037U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 340 and Celeron 1037U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Athlon X2 340 and Celeron 1037U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 340 and Celeron 1037U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 340 and Celeron 1037U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X2 340 and Celeron 1037U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 340 and Celeron 1037U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 340 0.85
+30.8%
Celeron 1037U 0.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 340 1307
+31%
Celeron 1037U 998

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X2 340 310
Celeron 1037U 310

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X2 340 443
Celeron 1037U 525
+18.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 0.65
Recency 2 October 2012 20 January 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

Athlon X2 340 has a 30.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 1037U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X2 340 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1037U in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X2 340 is a desktop processor while Celeron 1037U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 340 and Celeron 1037U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 340
Athlon X2 340
Intel Celeron 1037U
Celeron 1037U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 10 votes

Rate Athlon X2 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 75 votes

Rate Celeron 1037U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 340 or Celeron 1037U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.