Ryzen 3 2200U vs Athlon PRO 200GE

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 200GE
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
2.32
+2.7%
Ryzen 3 2200U
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.26

Athlon PRO 200GE outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 3 2200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17951818
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency6.2714.26
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 3 2200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier3225
L1 cache96K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 3 2200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 3 2200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 3 2200U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 3 2200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 3 2200U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 200GE 2.32
+2.7%
Ryzen 3 2200U 2.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon PRO 200GE 3693
+3.1%
Ryzen 3 2200U 3583

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon PRO 200GE 932
+18%
Ryzen 3 2200U 790

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon PRO 200GE 1887
+18.2%
Ryzen 3 2200U 1596

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 2.26
Recency 1 June 2018 26 October 2017
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon PRO 200GE has a 2.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 months.

Ryzen 3 2200U, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 3 2200U.

Note that Athlon PRO 200GE is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 2200U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 3 2200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
Athlon PRO 200GE
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Ryzen 3 2200U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 536 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 200GE or Ryzen 3 2200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.