EPYC 7H12 vs Athlon PRO 200GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 200GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.54
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
45.02
+1672%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Athlon PRO 200GE by a whopping 1672% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 200GE and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking165537
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.1021.95
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date6 September 2018 (5 years ago)18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$70 $1970

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7H12 has 117% better value for money than Athlon PRO 200GE.

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 200GE and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB4 MB
L2 cache1 MB32 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 200GE and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 200GE 2.54
EPYC 7H12 45.02
+1672%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Athlon PRO 200GE by 1672% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon PRO 200GE 3926
EPYC 7H12 69633
+1674%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Athlon PRO 200GE by 1674% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.54 45.02
Recency 6 September 2018 18 September 2019
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon PRO 200GE in performance tests.

Note that Athlon PRO 200GE is a desktop processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 200GE and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
Athlon PRO 200GE
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 21 vote

Rate Athlon PRO 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 200GE or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.