C-70 vs Athlon Neo X2 L325
Primary details
Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L325 and C-70 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon Neo | AMD C-Series |
| Architecture codename | Congo (2009) | Ontario (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 September 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon Neo X2 L325 and C-70 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | no data | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon Neo X2 L325 and C-70 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | ASB1 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and C-70. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization Technology | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and C-70 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and C-70. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6290 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 September 2009 | 1 September 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 9 Watt |
C-70 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo X2 L325 and C-70. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo X2 L325 and C-70, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
