Pentium 4 1.80 vs Athlon II X2 270

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 270 and Pentium 4 1.80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2583not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.15no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.19no data
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Willamette (2000−2001)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)August 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 270 and Pentium 4 1.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB8 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm180 nm
Die size117 mm2217 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors410 million42 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 270 and Pentium 4 1.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt67 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 270 and Pentium 4 1.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 270 and Pentium 4 1.80.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 270 1301
+1031%
Pentium 4 1.80 115

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 67 Watt

Athlon II X2 270 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 3.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X2 270 and Pentium 4 1.80. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 270 and Pentium 4 1.80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 270
Athlon II X2 270
Intel Pentium 4 1.80
Pentium 4 1.80

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 234 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 222 votes

Rate Pentium 4 1.80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 270 or Pentium 4 1.80, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.