MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Athlon 64 X2 6000+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 6000+
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.59
MediaTek Kompanio 520
8 cores / 8 threads, 2000 Watt
1.99
+237%

MediaTek Kompanio 520 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by a whopping 237% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28021923
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMediaTek Kompanio 500
Power efficiency0.450.09
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55
Release dateAugust 2007 (17 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache512Kno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm
Die size220 mm2no data
Number of transistors227 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt2000 Watt

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 1.99
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 2000 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ has 1500% lower power consumption.

MediaTek Kompanio 520, on the other hand, has a 237.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The MediaTek Kompanio 520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop processor while MediaTek Kompanio 520 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MediaTek Kompanio 520
Kompanio 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 313 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 34 votes

Rate MediaTek Kompanio 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 6000+ or MediaTek Kompanio 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.