Pentium E5300 vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 4800+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.43
Pentium E5300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.57
+32.6%

Pentium E5300 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4800+ by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Pentium E5300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29762830
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.04
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.630.83
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release dateno dataNovember 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Pentium E5300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cache256K64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size220 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Number of transistors233 million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Pentium E5300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Pentium E5300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Pentium E5300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Pentium E5300 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Pentium E5300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 0.43
Pentium E5300 0.57
+32.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 679
Pentium E5300 906
+33.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 0.57
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm

Pentium E5300 has a 32.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Pentium E5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Pentium E5300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Intel Pentium E5300
Pentium E5300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 76 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 588 votes

Rate Pentium E5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4800+ or Pentium E5300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.