Athlon II X3 460 vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+

Place in the ranking	2976	2303
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	5.49
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)	no data
Power efficiency	0.62	1.25
Architecture codename	Windsor (2006−2007)	Rana (2009−2011)
Release date	no data	3 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon II X3 460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	3 (Tri-Core)
Threads	2	3
Base clock speed	no data	3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
Bus rate	1000 MHz	no data
L1 cache	256K	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512K	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	90 nm	45 nm
Die size	220 mm²	169 mm²
Number of transistors	233 million	300 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon II X3 460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	939	AM3
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon II X3 460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon II X3 460.

PCIe version

no data

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 0.43

Athlon II X3 460 1.26
+193%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 679

Athlon II X3 460 2008
+196%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.43	1.26
Physical cores	2	3
Threads	2	3
Chip lithography	90 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ has 46.2% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X3 460, on the other hand, has a 193% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon II X3 460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Athlon II X3 460, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.