Duron 950 vs Athlon 64 FX-76

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-76 and Duron 950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Duron
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Spitfire (2000−2001)
Release dateNovember 2006 (18 years ago)12 November 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-76 and Duron 950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz0.95 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data200 MT/s
Multiplierno data9.5
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB64 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm180 nm
Die size235 mm2105.68 mm2
Number of transistors227 million25 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-76 and Duron 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFA
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt25 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-76 and Duron 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR1 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 25 Watt

Athlon 64 FX-76 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Duron 950, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-76 and Duron 950. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-76 and Duron 950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-76
Athlon 64 FX-76
AMD Duron 950
Duron 950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-76 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Duron 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-76 or Duron 950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.