Ryzen 9 5950X vs Athlon 64 FX-74

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 FX-74
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.61
Ryzen 9 5950X
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
28.71
+4607%

Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Athlon 64 FX-74 by a whopping 4607% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-74 and Ryzen 9 5950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2784159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1326.59
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency0.4625.88
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Release dateNovember 2006 (18 years ago)5 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5950X has 20354% better value for money than Athlon 64 FX-74.

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-74 and Ryzen 9 5950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.9 GHz
Multiplierno data34
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size235 mm2CPU cores: 2x 80.7 sq. mm., I/O: 125 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors227 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-74 and Ryzen 9 5950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFAM4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and Ryzen 9 5950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and Ryzen 9 5950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and Ryzen 9 5950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and Ryzen 9 5950X.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 FX-74 0.61
Ryzen 9 5950X 28.71
+4607%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-74 972
Ryzen 9 5950X 45601
+4591%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 28.71
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen 9 5950X has a 4606.6% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 19% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 5950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-74 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-74 and Ryzen 9 5950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Ryzen 9 5950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2506 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-74 or Ryzen 9 5950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.