D-1513N vs Athlon 64 FX-74

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-74 and D-1513N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2784not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon D
Power efficiency0.46no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release dateNovember 2006 (18 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500$192

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-74 and D-1513N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size235 mm2246.24 mm2
Number of transistors227 million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-74 and D-1513N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFno data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and D-1513N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 FX-74 and D-1513N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and D-1513N are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and D-1513N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.861 GB/s

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

D-1513N has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-74 and D-1513N. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-74 is a desktop processor while D-1513N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-74 and D-1513N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74
Intel D-1513N
D-1513N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate D-1513N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-74 or D-1513N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.