UHD Graphics 605 vs Athlon 64 FX-62

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and UHD Graphics 605 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2769not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAthlon 64 (Desktop)Intel UHD Graphics
Power efficiency0.48no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Gen9.5
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and UHD Graphics 605 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz0.25 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and UHD Graphics 605 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and UHD Graphics 605. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data8,192 MB 8,388,608 KB 8,589,934,592 B 0.00781 TiB 8 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 605 has a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-62 and UHD Graphics 605. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-62 is a desktop processor while UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-62 and UHD Graphics 605, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
Athlon 64 FX-62
Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 17 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-62 or UHD Graphics 605, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.