Athlon 64 FX-62: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 FX-62 provides poor benchmark performance at 0.65% of a leader's which is a 96-core Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Summary

This is a Windsor architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 90 manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2800 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is processor with a TDP of 125 Watt.

Primary details

Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking2746
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processor
SeriesAthlon 64 (Desktop)
Power efficiency0.47of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U)
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)
Release dateno data

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Boost clock speed2.8 GHzof 50 MHz (i486DX-50)
Bus rate1000 MHz
Chip lithography90 nmof 0.18 µm (K6-2+/450ACZ)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattof 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Athlon 64 FX-62. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 FX-62 0.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-62 993

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 FX-62 2149

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Athlon 64 FX-62's performance relative to its closest rivals among desktop CPUs.


Intel equivalent

According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to Athlon 64 FX-62 is Core 2 Duo E6700, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our ranking.

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Athlon 64 FX-62:

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Athlon 64 FX-62, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Athlon 64 FX-62 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 17 configurations using Athlon 64 FX-62 in our database.

All comparisons with Athlon 64 FX-62

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-62, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.