Celeron M 743 vs Athlon 64 3600+

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 3600+
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.38
+153%
Celeron M 743
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.15

Athlon 64 3600+ outperforms Celeron M 743 by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3600+ and Celeron M 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30143299
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency0.401.42
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3600+ and Celeron M 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache128K64 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography130 nm45 nm
Die size193 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors106 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3600+ and Celeron M 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754BGA965
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt10 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and Celeron M 743. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 0.15
Chip lithography 130 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 10 Watt

Athlon 64 3600+ has a 153.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron M 743, on the other hand, has a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 790% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 64 3600+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 743 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 3600+ is a desktop processor while Celeron M 743 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3600+ and Celeron M 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3600+
Athlon 64 3600+
Intel Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Celeron M 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3600+ or Celeron M 743, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.