Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Athlon 64 3000+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1229 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.90 |
| Architecture codename | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Broadwell-DT (2015) |
| Release date | January 2001 (23 years ago) | 2 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 160 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 154 million | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 754 | FCLGA1150 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| eDRAM | no data | 128 MB |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| FDI | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 29.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Pro P6300 |
| Max video memory | no data | 32 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.15 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 48 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 95 Watt |
Athlon 64 3000+ has 6.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon E3-1285 v4, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 3000+ is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1285 v4 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon E3-1285 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
