Athlon MP 2100+ vs Athlon 64 2600+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon MP 2100+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3296not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon MP
Power efficiency0.95no data
Architecture codenameLima (2008−2009)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateJanuary 2008 (16 years ago)19 June 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$262

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon MP 2100+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266 MT/s
Multiplierno data13
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB256 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die size77 mm2128 mm2
Number of transistors122 million38 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon MP 2100+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt66 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon MP 2100+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 66 Watt

Athlon 64 2600+ has a 176.9% more advanced lithography process, and 340% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon MP 2100+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 2600+ is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 2100+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon MP 2100+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 2600+
Athlon 64 2600+
AMD Athlon MP 2100+
Athlon MP 2100+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 2600+ or Athlon MP 2100+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.