Athlon 64 1500+ vs Athlon 64 2600+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon 64 1500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3296 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.95 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Lima (2008−2009) | Venice (2004−2005) |
| Release date | January 2008 (16 years ago) | November 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon 64 1500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 77 mm2 | 84 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 122 million | 69 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon 64 1500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 9 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 9 Watt |
Athlon 64 2600+ has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 1500+, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon 64 1500+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon 64 1500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
