FX-9830P vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 40 Watt
27.17
+1194%
FX-9830P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.10

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms FX-9830P by a whopping 1194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9830P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1801881
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesApple M4AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency63.955.65
Architecture codenameno dataBristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9830P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads144
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data320 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per module)
Chip lithography3 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9830P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP4
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9830P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9830P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9830P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 20-core GPUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9830P.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.17 2.10
Recency 30 October 2024 31 May 2016
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 14 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 1193.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX-9830P, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9830P in performance tests.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while FX-9830P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9830P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
M4 Pro (14 cores)
AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 113 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) or FX-9830P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.